DEP AR Tiveik ss Gr + fae Meee
Se em Fak SOP PpeECTION MOF NAVAL RECORDS
7o1 Ss. Col RTHOUSE ROAD, SU! FE Tew
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
Y
i 3
oa
tn
ona
[a
ct
the circumstances 0
weE-Gai1iLOo eS
cannot be taken.
material
decision. N
the Board pr
noc
~ DM O10
+
a
9)
Q
Ho
h-
ret i
wT
Ks
HER
raw
fb
Qa 5
ct
L.'ty LQ LQ
ii
c
mn
}H-
t
t
u
tO) 1.
4
'
om
y attaches
is importan
to demonst
5
a
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11558-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 9) en) 0 ct ty fay =) to Ww CG Oh 4 PR ° Board. OD Oct fe a) K bh Wy HI Q O 5 uw jt M 0 He HO 5 0) 4 ct (D R et 4 Or LQ a ct ie D cat) K = of your oy I i om un ct o a support thereof, your naval recor Pt regulations and policies In addition, the Board con enclosed advisory opinion from Headgq ine Co careful and conscientious consideration of the a 2 Gh . H- B ct ct tn £ K S 2 of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10502 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket No. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6468 14
{ ) al r a) ¢ a Tm 6d \ > gus oO 4 t cd ie) ) i ) r AUT) oti C { QO -d C ay) ty 43 GS o S es b Docket No. Members who are retired are not eligible to cransfer your education benefits. The Board found that there was not revision to the Post-9/11 GI Bill law or policy in December 2009 as you claim.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8123 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy 2. The Board, consis reviewed Petitioner's 5792 23 March 2015 and, Pf : tt mM f b- yorsp Hw 0 @ or Hs | OM & ct QQ Y Fh cr .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3756 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100% ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 No. NR3756-1 Param - Chairmar Rnara Far Correrctrian of Naval Records m™ . Cporreraryv oTr tne sary Los Secretary or the NaVY cry LLCO Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD esting, requ to adjust stitioner's allegations of error and I ‘ 7 geass oiegar me SEAS 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9618 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of r =re > (a) Subjex titioner, Enlisted Supe rSe 68-14 ere nat ey paps pte a's wy ped 1; roxrrer re 4 COSLIECtCLIve acti Cll raAeanrte = reo 1 radence OL rec f paragon ee ase Hh nal Cons. NR9618-14 RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to i. show tha m ct a.
Applicact's s u b x i s s i o ~ is at Exhibit Ti. The appropriate Air Force off;re evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory o p i n i o r . Appiicant's resporse to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. l2ursuar.t ts the 2 o a r d ' s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigatlon, Washington, D .